Attorney Grievance v. Gertner

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided June 25, 2015·No. 108ag/14·Published

Opinion

i } ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE IN THE i r l q I I I

* COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * * COURT OF APPEALS at * OF MARYLAND Petitioner * * Misc. Docket AG V_ * * No. 108 i ABRAHAM ALLAN GERTNER * i * September Term, 20 14 i 1‘ ’ Respondent * i 3 ! ii ****************************

m i

with Right to Apply for Reinstatement In Not Less Than One-Hundred Twenty (120) Days, filed

herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 25th day of fife

H___, 2015,

’1 This Court having considered the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension 1 ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Abraham Allan Gertner be, and I

1 he is hereby, indefinitely suspended by consent from the practice of law in the State of

Rules of Professional Conduct 1.4, 1.15, 1.7 and 8.4(d), and it is further

ORDERED, that the Respondent may apply for reinstatement no sooner than one- hundred twenty (120) days from the date this Order is entered, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Abraham Allan Gertner from the register of attorneys in this Court, and shall certify that fact to the Client Protection

Maryland, effective thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, for violating Maryland Lawyers' l i Fund of Maryland and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State pursuant to Maryland

/s/ Glenn T. Harrell, Jr.

Senior Jddge

1 Rule 16-772(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance v. Gertner, (Md. 2015).

Attorney Grievance v. Gertner (Attorney Grievance v. Gertner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.