Attorney Grievance v. Furrer
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Furrer (Attorney Grievance v. Furrer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Petitioner,
V. Misc. Docket AG No. 54 September Term, 2017 DAVID EUGENE FURRER
Respondent.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent filed
herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, in which the Respondent admits that sufficient
evidence exists to sustain allegations that he committed professional misconduct in
violation of Rules 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.16 and 8.4(a), (c), and (d) of the Maryland
Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct, in effect at the time of the misconduct, it is this
18th day of January ,2018
ORDERED, that Respondent, David Eugene Furrer, be and he is hereby
indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of David Eugene
Furrer from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of
the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all clerks of all judicial tribunals in
this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-742.
/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Furrer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-furrer-md-2018.