Attorney Grievance v. Dimas
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Dimas (Attorney Grievance v. Dimas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND * OF MARYLAND * * Petitioner * Misc. Docket AG * v. * No. 43 * MARILYN D. DIMAS * September Term, 2014 * * Respondent *
*********************************************
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant
to Maryland Rule 16-772, in which Respondent admits she committed professional misconduct
in violation of Rule 1.15 and 8.1(c) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional
Conduct, it is this 21st day of October, 2014,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Respondent, Marilyn D. Dimas,
be and she is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective forty-
five (45) days from the date of this Order; and it is further
ORDERED, that, forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order, the Clerk of this Court
shall remove the name of Marilyn D. Dimas from the register of attorneys in the Court and
certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and clerks
of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).
/s/ Glenn T. Harrell, Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Dimas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-dimas-md-2014.