Attorney Grievance v. Dantes
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Dantes (Attorney Grievance v. Dantes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION* IN THE OF MARYLAND • COURT OF APPEALS Petitioner, • OF MARYLAND
V.
PHILLIP G. DANTES • Misc. Docket AG
Respondent. • No. 45
• September Term, 2017
ORDER
The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having consider the Joint Petition of the Attorney
Grievance Commission and Respondent, Phillip G. Dantes, to place Respondent
on Inactive Status by Consent pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736(c), it is this 6th
day of December ,2017
ORDERED, that the Joint Petition be, and it is hereby GRANTED, and the
Respondent, Phillip G. Dantes, is hereby placed on Inactive Status by consent; and it is
further,
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Phillip G. Dantes
from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund
of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with
Maryland Rule 19-761.
/s/ Clayton Greenet Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Dantes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-dantes-md-2017.