Attorney Grievance v. Craddock
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Craddock (Attorney Grievance v. Craddock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS
v. * OF MARYLAND
* Misc. Docket AG No. 66
MYESHA RUTH CRADDOCK * September Term, 2021
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of
Maryland and the Respondent, MyEsha Ruth Craddock, to disbar the Respondent from the
practice of law, it is this 23rd day of February, 2022
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, MyEsha
Ruth Craddock, be, and hereby is, disbarred from the practice of law in the State of
Maryland for violation of Rule 8.4(a), (b), (c) and (d) of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of
Professional Conduct; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of MyEsha Ruth
Craddock from the register of attorneys in this Court, and certify that fact to the Trustees of
the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in
this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761(b).
/s/ Robert N. McDonald Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Craddock, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-craddock-md-2022.