Attorney Grievance v. Coppock
This text of 462 Md. 258 (Attorney Grievance v. Coppock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND petitioner, * Misc. Docket AG, No. v. t.rtember Term, 20lg 14
* JOHN EDWARD COPPOCK , JR. Respondent.
ORDER
This matter came before the court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance commission of Maryland and Respondent, John Edward Coppock Jr., to reprimand the Respondent for violations of Rules 1.3 and 8.4(d) of the Maryland Rules of professional Conduct. The Court having considered the Petition, and the record herein, it is this 3rd
day of January,2019;
ORDERED, that the Respondent, John Edward Coppock, Jr., be reprimanded for violating Rules l '3 and 8.4(d) of the Maryland Rules professional of conducr: and it is further
ORDERED, that judgment in the amount of $802.00 be entered against the Respondent in favor of the Attorney Grievance commission of Maryland.
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal
/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2019-01-03 14:55-05:00 Chief Judge
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
462 Md. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-coppock-md-2019.