Attorney Grievance v. Chaudry
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * Misc. AG Docket No. 40 ADAM LANE CHAUDRY * September Term, 2022 *
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed by
the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Adam Lane
Chaudry, on December 27, 2022, in which the parties agree that the Respondent
engaged in misconduct that violates the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional
Conduct set forth below and the Respondent consents to disbarment as the
appropriate sanction, it is this 3rd day of January, 2023,
ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that, effective immediately,
the Respondent, Adam Lane Chaudry, is disbarred from the practice of law in the
State of Maryland for violation of Rule 8.4(a), (b), (c) and (d) of the Maryland
Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Adam Lane
Chaudry from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Trustees
of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial
tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761(b).
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. /s/ Shirley M. Watts Senior Justice Digitally signed by Kisha Taylor-Wallace DN: cn=Kisha Taylor-Wallace c=US l=Annapolis o=Court of Kisha Taylor-Wallace Appeals, Maryland State e=kisha.taylor-wallace@mdcourts.gov Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Location: Date: 2023-01-03 09:05-05:00
Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
287 A.3d 1254 (Attorney Grievance v. Chaudry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.