Attorney Grievance v. Burch
Opinion
AT'TORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMIS SION IN THE OF MARYLAND COUR]'OF APPEALS OF MARYLANI)
Petitioner Misc. Docket AG
v. No.---
31
Septcmbcr Term, 20 17
JOHN'I'HOMAS BURCH, JR. * +
Respondent * {.
* *** * d. * * * * * * *** * * ** * * * * *** * * * ** rl.,t {< *,t {< * * ** * * * + * * ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbannent by Consent filed herein
pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736 and Respondenfs acknowledgement therein that
suff,rcient evidence exists to sustain allegations that he committed professi<lnal
misconduct in violation of Rules 8.a@)(c) & (d) of the Maryland Lawyerd Rules of
Professional Conduct in etfect at the time of the misconduct, it is this 12th day of
October ,2017,
ORDERED, that John Thomas Burch, Jr., Respondent, is hereby disbarred by
consent fiom the practice of law in this State, eflbctive immediately; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of John Thomas
Burch, Jr. liom the register of attorneys in this Court, notify Respondent of the filing of
this order in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-742(a)(l), and comply with the notice
provisions set forth in Maryland Rule l9-761(b).
/s/ Clayton Greene Jr.
Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Attorney Grievance v. Burch (Attorney Grievance v. Burch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.