Home/Court of Appeals of Maryland/Attorney Grievance v. Buckel

Attorney Grievance v. Buckel

5 A.3d 59, 416 Md. 71
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedSeptember 28, 2010
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 16, Sept. Term 2010
StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.3d 59 (Attorney Grievance v. Buckel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. Buckel, 5 A.3d 59, 416 Md. 71 (Md. 2010).

Opinion

5 A.3d 59 (2010)
416 Md. 71

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner
v.
Jason Cord BUCKEL, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG No. 16, Sept. Term 2010.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

September 28, 2010.

ORDER

The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having considered the Joint Petition of the *60 Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Jason Cord Buckel, to reprimand the respondent, it is this 28th day of September, 2010;

ORDERED, that the Joint Petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and the Respondent, Jason Cord Buckel, is reprimanded by consent for violating Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3, 3.1 and 8.1(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Buckel
5 A.3d 59 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.3d 59, 416 Md. 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-buckel-md-2010.