Attorney Grievance v. Broida
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Broida (Attorney Grievance v. Broida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF MARYLAND * OF MARYLAND * *
Petitioner * Misc. Docket AG
*
v. * No. 71 *
CHARLES JEFFREY BROIDA * September Term, 2014 * * *
Respondent
*********************************************
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16—772, in which Respondent admits he violated Rule 8.1(a) and Rule 8.4(a)- (d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct, it is this 1_5‘E day of December, 2014,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Respondent, Charles Jeffrey Broida, be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Charles Jeffrey Broida from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in
accordance with Maryland Rule l6-772(d).
/s/ Glenn T. Harrell Jr. Senior Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Broida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-broida-md-2014.