Attorney Grievance v. Bostick
This text of 291 A.3d 1144 (Attorney Grievance v. Bostick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE * ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE SUPREME COURT COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 34 CHRISTINA JULIANNE BOSTICK * September Term, 2022 *
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Order Transferring the Respondent to
Disability Inactive Status by Consent filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission and the
Respondent, Christina Julianne Bostick, on March 16, 2023, it is this 24th day of March
2023, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,
ORDERED that the Joint Petition is GRANTED, and the Respondent, Christina
Julianne Bostick, is hereby transferred to disability inactive status by consent, and it is
further
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Christina Julianne
Bostick from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Client
Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State
in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761(b).
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this /s/ Matthew J. Fader document is authentic. Chief Justice 2023-03-24 13:39-04:00
Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
291 A.3d 1144, 483 Md. 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-bostick-md-2023.