Attorney Grievance v. Baker
This text of 248 A.3d 357 (Attorney Grievance v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS
* OF MARYLAND v. * Misc. Docket AG No. 81
KELLEE GENEAN BAKER * September Term, 2020
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed by the
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Kellee Genean Baker,
pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, in the above-captioned case, it is this 26th day of March,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Kellee Genean
Baker, be, and she hereby is, REPRIMANDED for violating Rules 1.1, 1.3, and 8.4(a) and (d)
of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct and the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules
of Professional Conduct in effect at the time of the misconduct.
/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2021-03-26 11:16-04:00
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.3d 357, 473 Md. 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-baker-md-2021.