Attorney Grievance v. Baker

248 A.3d 357, 473 Md. 36
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided March 26, 2021·No. 81ag/20·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS

* OF MARYLAND

v.

* Misc. Docket AG No. 81

KELLEE GENEAN BAKER * September Term, 2020

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Kellee Genean Baker, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, in the above-captioned case, it is this 26th day of March, 2021

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Kellee Genean Baker, be, and she hereby is, REPRIMANDED for violating Rules 1.1, 1.3, and 8.4(a) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct and the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct in effect at the time of the misconduct.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera

Chief Judge

Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2021-03-26 11:16-04:00

Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance v. Baker, 248 A.3d 357, 473 Md. 36 (Md. 2021).

248 A.3d 357 (Attorney Grievance v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.