Attorney Grievance v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided November 5, 2018·No. 27ag/18·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE

OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND

Petitioner,

* Misc. Docket AG No.27 _

v.

September Term, 201 8

*

*

CHARLES B. BAILEY

*

Respondent.

ORDER

consideration of the Joint Petition for 30-Day Suspension by Consent filed Upon

the Respondent admits that sufficient herein pursuant t0 Maryland Rule 19-736, in which

evidence exists to sustain allegations that he commi tted professional misconduct in

violation of Rules 19-301.15(a), 19-407(a)(2), (a)(3), (b), (c), & (d), and 19-410 of the

5th day of November 2018:

Rules 0f Professional Conduct, this , it is

that the Respondent, Charles B. Bailey, is hereby suspended from the

ORDERED,

of law in the State of Maryland for thirty (30) days; and it is further practice

of entry; and

ORDERED, that this Order shall be effective thirty days from the date

it is further

from

ORDERED, that the Clerk 0fthis Conn shall strike the name Charles B. Bailey

that fact to the Trustees of the Client the register 0f attorneys in the Court and certify

Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State Protection

in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-742.

Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera

Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document " authentic.

2018-11-05 15:08-05:00 Chief Judge

Suzanne C. Johnson, Acting Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance v. Bailey, (Md. 2018).

Attorney Grievance v. Bailey (Attorney Grievance v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.