Attorney Grievance v. Armstrong

241 A.3d 885, 471 Md. 311
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedNovember 20, 2020
Docket35agpc/19
StatusPublished

This text of 241 A.3d 885 (Attorney Grievance v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. Armstrong, 241 A.3d 885, 471 Md. 311 (Md. 2020).

Opinion

Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case No. 24-C-19-005273

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

OF MARYLAND

Misc. Docket AG No. 35 September Term, 2019

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

v.

DARRYL RUSSEL ARMSTRONG

Barbera, C. J., McDonald Watts Hotten Getty Booth Biran

JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

Filed: November 20, 2020

Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

Suzanne Johnson 2020-11-20 11:31-05:00

Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * IN THE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS

v. * OF MARYLAND

* Misc. Docket AG No. 35

DARRYL RUSSEL ARMSTRONG * September Term, 2019

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 20th day of

November 2020

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Darryl

Russel Armstrong be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further

practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Darryl Russel

Armstrong from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-761, shall

certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial

tribunals in the State; and it is further

ORDERED that Respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this

Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-709, for which

sum judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland

against Darryl Russel Armstrong.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.3d 885, 471 Md. 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-armstrong-md-2020.