Attorney Grievance v. Angelos
This text of 291 A.3d 230 (Attorney Grievance v. Angelos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * SUPREME COURT
* OF MARYLAND v. * AG Docket No. 55 PETER GEORGE ANGELOS * September Term, 2022
ORDER
In an order entered on March 3, 2023 regarding the parties’ Joint Petition for Order
Transferring the Respondent to Disability Inactive Status by Consent (the “Joint Petition”),
the Court determined that it could not grant the Joint Petition under Rule 19-739 without a
statement that the Joint Petition had been approved by the Chair of the Attorney Grievance
Commission, as required by Rule 19-739(c)(1). Subsequently, Bar Counsel supplemented
the Joint Petition with a line stating that the Chair of the Attorney Grievance Commission
has approved the filing of the Joint Petition.
Accordingly, upon consideration of the Joint Petition as supplemented, it is this 9th
day of March 2023, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,
ORDERED that the request to transfer the respondent to disability inactive status is
GRANTED to the extent that the respondent, Peter George Angelos, is transferred to
disability inactive status pursuant to Rule 19-739(b)(3); and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Peter George
Angelos from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Client
Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761(b); and it is further
ORDERED that all papers filed in this case, except for this order, are confidential
and shall not be disclosed except as permitted by rule or order of this Court.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2023-03-09 12:19-05:00
Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
291 A.3d 230, 483 Md. 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-angelos-md-2023.