Attorney Grievance v. Amos
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Amos (Attorney Grievance v. Amos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS Petitioner
OF MARYLAND
v. MISC. DOCKET AG, NO. 46
ESTHUS CHRISTOPHER AMOS SEPTEMBER TERM, 2014
**********
Respondent ************************* m
The Court having considered the Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action and the responses of Bar Counsel and Respondent to the Show Cause Order issued September 29, 2014 filed in the above entitled case, it is thisfl day of December, 2014
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that Respondent, Esthus Christopher Amos, be, and he is hereby, indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland pursuant to Rule 16—778(c); and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Esthus Christopher Amos from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-760(e).
/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Amos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-amos-md-2014.