Attorney Grievance v. Alonso
This text of Attorney Grievance v. Alonso (Attorney Grievance v. Alonso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I I ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION
5* IN THE 1 OF MARYLAND $- COURT OF APPEALS r or MARYLAND Petitioner 3* ’1 Misc. Docket AG v. ’i‘ No. 82 m “ii September Term, 2014 JAIME ARTHURO ALONSO ri- as I Respondent "‘14
r**********t***#*ttt**ttttt*t****#*¢**tttt**t*¢
l ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment By Consent filed herein pursuant
dayof. _ January
_,.__,2015,
Respondent, be, and he hereby is, disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective January 31, 2015, for committing professional misconduct in violation of Rule 8.4(a), (b), (c) & (d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court, in accordance with Rule 16-772(d), shall strike the name of Jaime Arthuro Alonso from the register of attorneys in this Court as of January 31, 2015 and certify to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and the
clerks of all court in this State that the name of Jaime Arthuro Alonso has been so stricken,
7E7 Glenn T. HarrEJl, Jr, 'Senior Judge I
" to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 28th
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Jaime Arthuro Alonso, | |
l
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance v. Alonso, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-alonso-md-2015.