Attorney Grievance v. Adams
This text of 464 Md. 3 (Attorney Grievance v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND Petitioner, * * Misc. Docket AG v. * No. 83 * September Term, 2018 SCOTT GREGORY ADAMS * * Respondent. * *
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of
Maryland and the Respondent, Scott Gregory Adams, to reprimand the Respondent by consent, it
is this 28th day of May, 2019,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Scott Gregory Adams is hereby
reprimanded as reciprocal discipline in Maryland for professional misconduct he committed in
Maine, involving violations of Maine Rules of Professional Conduct 4.4(b) and 8.4(c) and (d) as
adjudicated by a Grievance Commission panel and affirmed by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court,
such conduct also having violated Rules 8.4(c) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of
Professional Conduct then in effect.
/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. Senior Judge Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2019-05-28 12:38-04:00
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
464 Md. 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-adams-md-2019.