Attorney Grievance v. Ackerman

243 A.3d 1197, 472 Md. 1
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJanuary 4, 2021
Docket55ag/19
StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.3d 1197 (Attorney Grievance v. Ackerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. Ackerman, 243 A.3d 1197, 472 Md. 1 (Md. 2021).

Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS

v. * OF MARYLAND

* Misc. Docket AG No. 55

DEBRA LEE ACKERMAN * September Term, 2019

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of

Maryland and Respondent, Debra Lee Ackerman, to suspend the Respondent from the

practice of law for sixty days, it is this 4th day of January, 2021

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that effective March 8, 2021, the

Respondent, Debra Lee Ackerman, be suspended from the practice of law for sixty days for

violation of Rule 8.1(a) and Rule 8.4(a), (c) and (d) of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of

Professional Conduct; and it is further

ORDERED, that, effective March 8, 2021, the Clerk of this Court shall remove the

name of Debra Lee Ackerman from the register of attorneys in this Court, and certify that

fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all

judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.

Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

Suzanne Johnson /s/ Mary Ellen Barbera 2021-01-04 11:08-05:00 Chief Judge

Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.3d 1197, 472 Md. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-ackerman-md-2021.