Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Weinberg
This text of 310 A.3d 651 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Weinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * AG Docket No.1 ASHER NEWTON WEINBERG * September Term, 2022
*
ORDER
After he was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law, Asher N. Weinberg
filed his first motion to modify his suspension. That motion was denied. Mr. Weinberg then
filed a second motion to modify his suspension. Upon consideration of Mr. Weinberg’s
second motion to modify his suspension, it is this 21st day of February 2024, by the
Supreme Court of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring,
ORDERED that the second motion for modification of suspension is granted in part;
and it is further
ORDERED that, pursuant to Rules 19-740(c)(2)(B) and 19-741(h), and accounting
from the date of this Order, Mr. Weinberg’s suspension from the practice of law is stayed
in favor of six months’ probation subject to the condition that he comply with the Maryland
Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2024.02.21 16:28:43 '00'05- Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
310 A.3d 651, 486 Md. App. 386, 486 Md. 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-weinberg-md-2024.