Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Teitelbaum
This text of 316 A.3d 889 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Teitelbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 43 GEORGE ALAN TEITELBAUM September Term, 2023 *
ORDER
Following the filing of the petition for disciplinary or remedial action, in which
Bar Counsel charged that respondent had been disciplined by the District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for violation of Rule 1.15(a) of the District of Columbia Rules of
Professional Conduct, the Court required the parties to show cause why reciprocal
discipline should not be imposed. Respondent did not respond to the order to show cause.
Bar Counsel did respond and recommended corresponding discipline.
It is, therefore, this 31st day of May 2024, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,
ORDERED that George Alan Teitelbaum is suspended from the practice of
law in Maryland for 30 days; and it is further
ORDERED that the suspension is stayed in favor of one year of unsupervised
probation under the same conditions imposed by the District of Columbia Court of
Appeals.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Chief Justice Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2024.05.31 08:47:03 -04'00'
Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
316 A.3d 889, 487 Md. 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-teitelbaum-md-2024.