Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Somerlock
This text of Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Somerlock (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Somerlock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 12 CARL DAVID SOMERLOCK * September Term, 2023 * ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand filed by Petitioner, the
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, and Respondent, Carl David Somerlock, on
October 24, 2023, in which the parties advise that Respondent agrees that his conduct, as
described in the Joint Petition, violated Rule 8.4(d) of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of
Professional Conduct and that Respondent consents to a reprimand as the appropriate
sanction, it is this 30th day of October 2023
ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that Respondent, Carl David
Somerlock, is REPRIMANDED for violating Rule 8.4(d) of the Maryland Attorneys’
Rules of Professional Conduct.
/s/ Shirley M. Watts Senior Justice
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2023-10-30 12:21-04:00
Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Somerlock, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-somerlock-md-2023.