Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Scofield
This text of Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Scofield (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Scofield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * SUPREME COURT
* OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 62 SUSAN WERNER SCOFIELD * September Term, 2025
ORDER
Upon consideration of the parties’ joint petition to disbar Respondent Susan
Werner Scofield from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, in which the
Respondent agrees that her conduct, as described in the petition, violated Maryland
Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 19-301.1, 19-301.3, 19-301.4, 19-301.5,
19-301.15, 19-301.16(d), 19-303.2, and 19-308.4 (a), (c), and (d); it is this 27th day
of May 2026, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,
ORDERED that the joint petition is granted and, effective immediately,
Respondent, Susan Werner Scofield, is disbarred; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall provide notice of this Order in
accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2026.05.27 '00'04- 12:41:34 Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Scofield, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-scofield-md-2026.