Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Scofield

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 27, 2026·No. 62ag/25·Published

Opinion

* IN THE

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * SUPREME COURT

* OF MARYLAND

v.

* AG No. 62

SUSAN WERNER SCOFIELD * September Term, 2025

ORDER

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint petition to disbar Respondent Susan Werner Scofield from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, in which the Respondent agrees that her conduct, as described in the petition, violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 19-301.1, 19-301.3, 19-301.4, 19-301.5, 19-301.15, 19-301.16(d), 19-303.2, and 19-308.4 (a), (c), and (d); it is this 27th day of May 2026, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, ORDERED that the joint petition is granted and, effective immediately, Respondent, Susan Werner Scofield, is disbarred; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall provide notice of this Order in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

Chief Justice

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2026.05.27

'00'04- 12:41:34

Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Scofield, (Md. 2026).

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Scofield (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Scofield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.