Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. O'Neill

322 A.3d 31, 488 Md. 454
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedAugust 27, 2024
Docket5ag/24
StatusPublished

This text of 322 A.3d 31 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. O'Neill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. O'Neill, 322 A.3d 31, 488 Md. 454 (Md. 2024).

Opinion

* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 5 * BRIAN DAVID O’NEILL September Term, 2024 *

ORDER

After the Attorney Grievance Commission filed its petition for disciplinary or

remedial action and request for temporary suspension, the Court issued an order

requiring respondent to show cause why he should not be temporarily suspended

pursuant to Rule 19-737(c). Respondent did not file a response.

Upon consideration of the petition for disciplinary or remedial action and

request for temporary suspension, it is this 27th day of August 2024, by the Supreme

Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 19-737(d), the Respondent, Brian David

O’Neill, is temporarily suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland;

and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Brian David

O’Neill from the register of attorneys in this Court and shall send notice of this Order to

the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all

judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. /s/ Matthew J. Fader 2024.08.27 Chief Justice 09:03:15 -04'00' Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
322 A.3d 31, 488 Md. 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-oneill-md-2024.