Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. McCollum

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided July 31, 2025·No. 59ag/24·Published

Opinion

* IN THE

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * SUPREME COURT

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * OF MARYLAND

v.

* AG No. 59

JAMES E. MCCOLLUM, JR.

* September Term, 2024

ORDER

Upon consideration of the parties’ Amended Joint Petition for Disbarment by

Consent filed in the above-captioned case on July 29, 2025, in which, pursuant to Rule

19-736(b), the parties jointly petition this Court to disbar the Respondent, James E.

McCollum, Jr., it is this 31st day of July 2025,

ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that the Joint Petition for

Disbarment by Consent is GRANTED, and that, effective immediately, Respondent, James

E. McCollum, Jr., is disbarred from the practice law in the State of Maryland for violation

of Rules 19-308.4(a), 19-308.4(b), 19-308.4(c), and 19-308.4(d) of the Maryland

Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall provide notice of this Order in

accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

/s/ Shirley M. Watts

2025.07.31 Senior Justice 16:36:33 -04'00'

Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. McCollum, (Md. 2025).

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. McCollum (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. McCollum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.