Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. McCollum
This text of Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. McCollum (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. McCollum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * SUPREME COURT COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 59 JAMES E. MCCOLLUM, JR. * September Term, 2024
ORDER
Upon consideration of the parties’ Amended Joint Petition for Disbarment by
Consent filed in the above-captioned case on July 29, 2025, in which, pursuant to Rule
19-736(b), the parties jointly petition this Court to disbar the Respondent, James E.
McCollum, Jr., it is this 31st day of July 2025,
ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that the Joint Petition for
Disbarment by Consent is GRANTED, and that, effective immediately, Respondent, James
E. McCollum, Jr., is disbarred from the practice law in the State of Maryland for violation
of Rules 19-308.4(a), 19-308.4(b), 19-308.4(c), and 19-308.4(d) of the Maryland
Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall provide notice of this Order in
accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. /s/ Shirley M. Watts 2025.07.31 Senior Justice 16:36:33 -04'00' Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. McCollum, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-mccollum-md-2025.