Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Mayers

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedSeptember 23, 2024
Docket7ag/24
StatusPublished

This text of Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Mayers (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Mayers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Mayers, (Md. 2024).

Opinion

* ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE IN THE COMMISSION * SUPREME COURT * v. OF MARYLAND * AG No. 7 SHEILA BRIDGET THURMOND * MAYERS September Term, 2024 *

ORDER

After the Attorney Grievance Commission filed its petition for disciplinary or

remedial action and request for immediate suspension, the Court issued an order

requiring the respondent to show cause why she should not be temporarily suspended

pursuant to Rule 19-737(d). After Bar Counsel was permitted to serve the respondent

by alternative service, service was obtained on August 27, 2024. The respondent has

not filed a response to the show cause order regarding her temporary suspension.

Accordingly, and upon consideration of the allegations in the petition for

disciplinary or remedial action, it is this 23rd day of September 2024, by the Supreme

Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 19-737(d), the respondent, Sheila Bridget

Thurmond Mayers, is temporarily suspended from the practice of law in the State of

Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that, subject to further order of this Court, the Clerk of this Court shall

temporarily strike the name of Sheila Bridget Thurmond Mayers from the register of

attorneys in this Court and shall send notice of this Order to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this

State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761; and it is further

ORDERED that further action on the petition for disciplinary or remedial action

will be taken after the respondent’s opportunity to respond to the petition pursuant to

Rule 19-737(c) and the Court’s July 31, 2024 order to show cause.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2024.09.23 12:42:24 -04'00' Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Mayers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-mayers-md-2024.