Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Loots

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedDecember 19, 2024
Docket24ag/24
StatusPublished

This text of Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Loots (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Loots) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Loots, (Md. 2024).

Opinion

* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * SUPREME COURT

* OF MARYLAND v. * AG Docket No. 24 JAMES MASON LOOTS * September Term, 2024

ORDER

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint petition to transfer the Respondent to

disability inactive status pursuant to Rules 19-736 and 19-737 and upon consideration of

the motion to seal the joint petition, it is this 19th day of December 2024, by the Supreme

Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that the joint petition is granted and the Respondent, James Mason

Loots, is transferred to disability inactive status pending further order of the Court, and it

is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of James Mason

Loots from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Client

Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State

in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761(b); and it is further

ORDERED that the motion to seal the joint petition is granted and the joint petition

is sealed and is not subject to public inspection.

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State /s/ Matthew J. Fader Government Article) this document is authentic. Chief Justice 2024.12.19 14:11:01 -05'00' Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Loots, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-loots-md-2024.