Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Larson-Jackson
This text of Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Larson-Jackson (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Larson-Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * SUPREME COURT
* OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 40 STEVE LARSON-JACKSON * September Term, 2025
ORDER
In its petition for disciplinary or remedial action, the Attorney Grievance
Commission alleges that Respondent, Steve Larson-Jackson, was temporarily
suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pending final
disposition of the disciplinary proceedings in that court. The Court required
Respondent to show cause why he should not be immediately suspended from the
practice of law pending a final disposition by the District of Columbia Court of
Appeals.
Upon consideration of the petition for disciplinary or remedial action and the
request for immediate suspension and upon consideration of Respondent’s response
to the Court’s order to show cause, it is this 26th day of May 2026, by the Supreme
Court of Maryland,
ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 19-737(d), Respondent, Steve Larson-
Jackson, is immediately suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland;
and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall send notice of this Order in
accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761. Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2026.05.26 /s/ Matthew J. Fader 08:41:18 -04'00' Chief Justice Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Larson-Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-larson-jackson-md-2026.