Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Lanton
This text of Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Lanton (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Lanton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * SUPREME COURT
* OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 42 FERRIAL HUSSEIN LANTON * September Term, 2024
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition for disciplinary or remedial action and
request for immediate suspension filed by Petitioner pursuant to Rule 19-721(a)(2)
and 19-738 and the Respondent’s response to the Court’s order to show cause, it is
this 21st day of March 2025, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,
ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 19-738(e), the Respondent, Ferrial Hussein
Lanton, is immediately suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland;
and it is further
ORDERED that Bar Counsel shall provide to the Court an update on the status
of Respondent’s criminal case and any appeal and provide Bar Counsel’s
recommendation as to a sanction; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall send notice of this Order in
accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal /s/ Matthew J. Fader Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Chief Justice Government Article) this document is authentic.
2025.03.21 13:21:07 -04'00' Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Lanton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-lanton-md-2025.