Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Lamm
This text of 317 A.3d 911 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Lamm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 53 JASON D. LAMM * September Term, 2023 * ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent in which the
parties advise that the Respondent agrees that his conduct, as alleged in Exhibit 1 to the
Joint Petition (November 6, 2023 order of admonition with probation by the Attorney
Discipline Probable Cause Committee of the Supreme Court of Arizona), violated Rules
1.7(a)(2) and 1.9 of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct, it is this 17th
day of June 2024,
ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that the Respondent, Jason D.
Lamm, is REPRIMANDED.
/s/ Shirley M. Watts Senior Justice
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2024.06.17 12:21:52 -04'00'
Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
317 A.3d 911, 487 Md. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-lamm-md-2024.