Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Lamm

317 A.3d 911, 487 Md. 260
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided June 17, 2024·No. 53ag/23·Published

Opinion

*

IN THE

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT

*

OF MARYLAND

v. * AG No. 53

JASON D. LAMM * September Term, 2023

*

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent in which the

parties advise that the Respondent agrees that his conduct, as alleged in Exhibit 1 to the

Joint Petition (November 6, 2023 order of admonition with probation by the Attorney

Discipline Probable Cause Committee of the Supreme Court of Arizona), violated Rules

1.7(a)(2) and 1.9 of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct, it is this 17th

day of June 2024,

ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that the Respondent, Jason D.

Lamm, is REPRIMANDED.

/s/ Shirley M. Watts

Senior Justice

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2024.06.17 12:21:52 -04'00'

Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Lamm, 317 A.3d 911, 487 Md. 260 (Md. 2024).

317 A.3d 911 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Lamm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.