Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Kurtyka
This text of 486 Md. 594 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Kurtyka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * SUPREME COURT
* OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 44 BRIAN MARTIN KURTYKA * September Term, 2023
ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent, filed by Bar
Counsel and Respondent, Brian Martin Kurtyka, on March 18, 2024 in the above-captioned
case, in which the parties jointly petition this Court to disbar Respondent pursuant to Rule
19-736,
WHEREAS, on February 27, 2024, the Attorney Grievance Commission filed a
Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action alleging that Respondent had been found
guilty of a serious crime within the meaning of Maryland Rule 19-701(t) and 19-738(a),
WHEREAS, on February 27, 2024, this Court issued a show cause order pursuant
to Maryland Rule 19-738(d) directing Respondent within fifteen days of the date of the
order to show cause in writing why he should not be immediately suspended from the
practice of law in the State of Maryland pending further order of this Court and, to date, no
response has been received,
WHEREAS, in the joint petition, the parties advise that Respondent was charged in
the Circuit Court for Washington County in State of Maryland vs. Brian M. Kurtyka, Case
No. C-21-CR-22-000725, with two counts of “Embezzlement Misappropriate” and one
count of “Forgery, Private Documents,” pled guilty to all three counts on January 16, 2024,
and was sentenced to fifteen years of incarceration with all but five years suspended and
five years’ supervised probation with restitution in the amount of $672,354.51 to be paid, WHEREAS, the parties advise that Respondent agrees that his conduct as described
in the joint petition violates Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct Rules
8.4(a), (b), (c), and (d) (misconduct) and that Respondent consents to disbarment, it is this
20th day of March 2024,
ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that the Joint Petition for
Disbarment by Consent is GRANTED, and the Respondent, Brian Martin Kurtyka, is
DISBARRED, effective immediately; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Brian Martin
Kurtyka from the register of attorneys in the Court, certify that fact to the Client Protection
Fund of the Maryland, and send notice to all Clerks of Court and other persons as required
by Maryland Rule 19-761.
/s/ Shirley M. Watts Senior Justice
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2024.03.21 08:50:00 -04'00'
Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
486 Md. 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-kurtyka-md-2024.