Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Koh

322 A.3d 31, 488 Md. 455
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedAugust 27, 2024
Docket10ag/24
StatusPublished

This text of 322 A.3d 31 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Koh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Koh, 322 A.3d 31, 488 Md. 455 (Md. 2024).

Opinion

* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * SUPREME COURT

* OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 10 FRANCIS H. KOH * September Term, 2024

ORDER

Upon consideration of the “Joint Petition for Reciprocal Discipline by Consent[,]”

filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission and Respondent, Francis H. Koh, in the

above-captioned case on August 23, 2024, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, in which the

parties advise that the sanctionable conduct at issue did not occur in Maryland and attach

a certified copy of an order of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board dated May 17,

2024, whereby the Board suspended Respondent on a reciprocal basis for a period of six

months, effective May 17, 2024 in the matter of In the Matter of Francis Huisuk Koh, VSB

Docket No. 24-000-131601, and the parties jointly request pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-

737 that Respondent be suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for a

period of six months, nunc pro tunc, beginning on May 17, 2024, it is this 27th day of

August 2024, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that the “Joint Petition for Reciprocal Discipline by Consent” is

GRANTED, and Respondent, Francis H. Koh, is suspended from the practice of law in the

State of Maryland for a period of six months, nunc pro tunc, beginning on May 17, 2024;

and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Francis H. Koh

from the register of attorneys in the Court and send notice of this order to the trustees of

the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals

in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2024.08.27 09:09:03 -04'00' Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
322 A.3d 31, 488 Md. 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-koh-md-2024.