Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Hardy

487 Md. 456
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided July 25, 2024·No. 4ag/24·Published

Opinion

* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * AG Docket No. 4 JAMES ROGER HARDY, II * September Term, 2024

CORRECTED ORDER

Upon consideration of the joint petition to suspend the respondent from the practice of

law for 120 days, nunc pro tunc to October 25, 2022, it is this 25th day of July 2024, by the

Supreme Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that the Respondent is suspended for 120 days, nunc pro tunc to October

25, 2022, and it is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 19-751, the respondent is reinstated to the Bar of

Maryland nunc pro tunc to February 23, 2023.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2024.07.29 15:21:49 -04'00'

Gregory Hilton, Clerk The correction notice(s) for this opinion(s) can be found here:

https://mdcourts.gov/sites/default/files/import/appellate/correctionnotices/coa/4a24agcn.pdf

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Hardy, 487 Md. 456 (Md. 2024).

487 Md. 456 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Hardy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.