Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Haffner
This text of Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Haffner (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Haffner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * SUPREME COURT
* OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 28 JULIAN ARNOLD HAFFNER * September Term, 2025
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition for disciplinary or remedial action and
request for 60-day suspension filed by the petitioner pursuant to Rule 19-737(f), and
upon consideration of the parties’ responses to the Court’s order to show cause, it is
this 20th day of March 2026, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,
ORDERED that, as corresponding discipline, the Respondent, Julian Arnold
Haffner, is suspended for 60 days from the practice of law in Maryland, to be
followed by one year of probation, for violations of the United States Patent and
Trademark Office Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall send notice of this Order in
accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2026.03.20 '00'04- 11:31:14 Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Haffner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-haffner-md-2026.