Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Gormley
Opinion
*
IN THE
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT
*
OF MARYLAND
v. * AG No. 29
BRIAN R. GORMLEY * September Term, 2024
*
ORDER
Upon consideration of the parties’ joint petition for reprimand by consent, in which
the parties jointly petition this Court to reprimand the Respondent, pursuant to Rules 19-
736(b) and 19-737, and in which the Respondent agrees that his conduct, as described in
the joint petition, violated Rules 19-301.7(b) and 19-305.1(a) of the Maryland Attorneys’
Rules of Professional Conduct, and that the appropriate disposition would be a reprimand,
it is this 19th day of December 2024, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,
ORDERED that the Respondent, Brian R. Gormley, is reprimanded.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader
Chief Justice
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2024.12.19 12:52:34 -05'00'
Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Gormley (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Gormley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.