Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Gormley

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided December 19, 2024·No. 29ag/24·Published

Opinion

*

IN THE

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT

*

OF MARYLAND

v. * AG No. 29

BRIAN R. GORMLEY * September Term, 2024

*

ORDER

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint petition for reprimand by consent, in which

the parties jointly petition this Court to reprimand the Respondent, pursuant to Rules 19-

736(b) and 19-737, and in which the Respondent agrees that his conduct, as described in

the joint petition, violated Rules 19-301.7(b) and 19-305.1(a) of the Maryland Attorneys’

Rules of Professional Conduct, and that the appropriate disposition would be a reprimand,

it is this 19th day of December 2024, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that the Respondent, Brian R. Gormley, is reprimanded.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

Chief Justice

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2024.12.19 12:52:34 -05'00'

Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Gormley, (Md. 2024).

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Gormley (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Gormley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.