Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Goldstein
This text of 312 A.3d 229 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 35 JEFFREY STEPHEN GOLDSTEIN * September Term, 2023 * ORDER
Upon consideration of the Joint Petitions for Disbarment by Consent filed by
Bar Counsel and Respondent, Jeffrey Stephen Goldstein, on March 11, 2024 and
March 18, 2024, respectively, in the above-captioned case, in which the parties jointly
petition this Court to disbar Respondent pursuant to Rule 19-736(b) and advise that
Respondent agrees that his conduct as described in the joint petitions violates Maryland
Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct Rules 1.15 (Safekeeping Property) and
8.4(a), (c), and (d) (Misconduct), Maryland Rules 19-407(a)(2) (Attorney Trust
Account Record-Keeping) and 19-410(a) and (b) (Prohibited Transactions), and
Maryland Code, Business Occupations & Professions § 10-306 and that the
appropriate disposition would be disbarment, and request that the Court order
Respondent disbarred effective March 31, 2024 or on the date of the order from this
Court, whichever is later, it is this 19th day of March 2024,
ORDERED that the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed on March 11,
2024 has been rendered moot by the filing of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent on March 18, 2024; and it is further
ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that, the Joint Petition for
Disbarment by Consent filed on March 18, 2024 is GRANTED, and the Respondent,
Jeffrey Stephen Goldstein, is hereby DISBARRED, effective March 31, 2024; and it is
further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Jeffrey Stephen
Goldstein from the register of attorneys maintained by the Clerk and certify that fact
to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of
all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761; and it is
ORDERED, that in light of the parties’ request in the joint petition filed on
March 18, 2024 that this Court order Respondent to pay costs incurred by the Attorney
Grievance Commission in the amount of $815.00, the Attorney Grievance
Commission file a statement of costs under Maryland Rule 19-709 describing the basis
for the $815.00 in costs on or before April 19, 2024.
/s/ Shirley M. Watts Senior Justice
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2024.03.19 15:23:14 -04'00'
2 Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
312 A.3d 229, 486 Md. 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-goldstein-md-2024.