Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Ghafoor

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided March 31, 2026·No. 6ago/25·Published

Opinion

* IN THE

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * SUPREME COURT

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * OF MARYLAND

v.

* AG No. 6

ASIM ABDUR RAHMAN GHAFOOR * September Term, 2025

ORDER

Upon consideration of the “Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent” filed by the parties in the above-captioned case on March 30, 2026, in which, pursuant to Rule 19-738, the parties jointly petition this Court to disbar Respondent, Asim Abdur Rahman Ghafoor, from the practice of law in the State of Maryland and advise that Respondent agrees that his conduct as described in the joint petition violates Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 19-308.4(a), (b), (c), and (d), and that Respondent consents to disbarment as the appropriate disposition, it is this 31st day of March 2026, ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that the Joint Petition for Disbarment is GRANTED, and that, effective immediately, Respondent, Asim Abdur Rahman Ghafoor, is disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for violation of Rules 19-308.4(a), 19-308.4(b), 19-308.4(c), and 19-308.4(d) of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall provide notice of this Order in accordance

with Maryland Rule 19-761.

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2026.03.31 /s/ Shirley M. Watts 10:40:21 -04'00' Senior Justice Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Ghafoor, (Md. 2026).

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Ghafoor (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Ghafoor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.