Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Edelstein

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided August 18, 2025·No. 8ag/25·Published

Opinion

* IN THE

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * SUPREME COURT

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * OF MARYLAND

v.

* AG No. 8

DAVID ANDREW EDELSTEIN * September Term, 2025

ORDER

Upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Petition for Disbarment filed in the above-captioned case on August 14, 2025, in which, pursuant to Rules 19-736 and 19-737, the parties jointly petition this Court to disbar the Respondent, David Andrew Edelstein, from the practice of law in the State of Maryland and advise that Respondent agrees that his conduct as described in the petition violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 19-308.4(a), 19-308.4(b), and 19-308.4(d), and that Respondent consents to disbarment as the appropriate disposition, it is this 18th day of August 2025, ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that the Joint Petition for Disbarment is GRANTED, and that, effective immediately, Respondent, David Andrew Edelstein, is disbarred from the practice law in the State of Maryland for violation of Rules 19-308.4(a), 19-308.4(b), and 19-308.4(d) of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall provide notice of this Order in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.

/s/ Shirley M. Watts

Senior Justice

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2025.08.18

08:20:51 -04'00'

Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Edelstein, (Md. 2025).

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Edelstein (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Edelstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.