Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Davis

318 A.3d 587, 487 Md. 384

Opinion

*

IN THE

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT

*

OF MARYLAND

v. * AG Docket No. 2

MARY ELIZABETH DAVIS * September Term, 2024

ORDER

After the Attorney Grievance Commission filed its petition for disciplinary or remedial action, which alleged that discipline had been imposed by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, the Court required the parties to show cause why corresponding discipline should not be imposed. Neither party responded to the Court’s order.

Upon consideration of the petition for disciplinary or remedial action, it is this 9th day of July 2024, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, ORDERED that, nunc pro tunc to July 29, 2023, respondent, Mary Elizabeth Davis, is suspended from the practice of law for 30 days with the entirety of the suspension stayed under the following conditions, both of which have already been satisfied:

(a) that respondent not be the subject of a disciplinary complaint that results in a finding of misconduct in this or any other jurisdiction for the nine-month period that started on June 21, 2022, and (b) that respondent take three hours of continuing legal education courses in legal

ethics.

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2024.07.09

'00'04- 14:03:30

Gregory Hilton, Clerk /s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice