Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Davis
This text of 318 A.3d 587 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * AG Docket No. 2 MARY ELIZABETH DAVIS * September Term, 2024
ORDER
After the Attorney Grievance Commission filed its petition for disciplinary or
remedial action, which alleged that discipline had been imposed by the District of Columbia
Court of Appeals, the Court required the parties to show cause why corresponding discipline
should not be imposed. Neither party responded to the Court’s order.
Upon consideration of the petition for disciplinary or remedial action, it is this 9th day
of July 2024, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,
ORDERED that, nunc pro tunc to July 29, 2023, respondent, Mary Elizabeth Davis, is
suspended from the practice of law for 30 days with the entirety of the suspension stayed
under the following conditions, both of which have already been satisfied:
(a) that respondent not be the subject of a disciplinary complaint that results in a
finding of misconduct in this or any other jurisdiction for the nine-month
period that started on June 21, 2022, and
(b) that respondent take three hours of continuing legal education courses in legal
ethics. Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2024.07.09 '00'04- 14:03:30
Gregory Hilton, Clerk /s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
318 A.3d 587, 487 Md. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-davis-md-2024.