Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Chang
This text of 310 A.3d 650 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Chang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * SUPREME COURT
* OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 36 ELAINE H. CHANG * September Term, 2023
ORDER
Upon consideration of the parties’ joint petition to suspend the respondent for 60
days, stayed in favor of six months of probation with terms, in which respondent agrees
that the conduct described in the petition violates Rule 19-301.7 (b)(4) (conflict) of the
Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct, and the Federal Immigration Rules
of Professional Conduct of Practitioners, 8 C.F.R. § 1003.102(r)(1) (communication), it
is this 16th day of February 2024, by the Supreme Court of Maryland
ORDERED that Elaine H. Chang is suspended for 60 days from the practice
of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further
ORDERED that the suspension is stayed in favor of six months of probation
under the terms contained in the Probation Agreement.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2024.02.16 '00'05- 12:44:36
Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
310 A.3d 650, 486 Md. App. 384, 486 Md. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-chang-md-2024.