Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Chang

310 A.3d 650, 486 Md. App. 384, 486 Md. 384
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided February 16, 2024·No. 36ag/23·Published

Opinion

* IN THE

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * SUPREME COURT

* OF MARYLAND

v.

* AG No. 36

ELAINE H. CHANG * September Term, 2023

ORDER

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint petition to suspend the respondent for 60 days, stayed in favor of six months of probation with terms, in which respondent agrees that the conduct described in the petition violates Rule 19-301.7 (b)(4) (conflict) of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct, and the Federal Immigration Rules of Professional Conduct of Practitioners, 8 C.F.R. § 1003.102(r)(1) (communication), it is this 16th day of February 2024, by the Supreme Court of Maryland ORDERED that Elaine H. Chang is suspended for 60 days from the practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further ORDERED that the suspension is stayed in favor of six months of probation under the terms contained in the Probation Agreement.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

Chief Justice

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2024.02.16

'00'05- 12:44:36

Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Chang, 310 A.3d 650, 486 Md. App. 384, 486 Md. 384 (Md. 2024).

310 A.3d 650 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Chang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 1003.102 — Grounds.
8 C.F.R. § 1003.102(r)(1)