Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Brent
This text of Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Brent (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Brent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * SUPREME COURT COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 2 DUNCAN KENNER BRENT * September Term, 2025
ORDER
After the Attorney Grievance Commission filed its petition for disciplinary or
remedial action and request for immediate suspension, the Court issued an order requiring
the Respondent to show cause why he should not be immediately suspended pursuant to
Rules 19-721(a)(2) and 19-737. Bar Counsel filed a response to the show cause order. The
Respondent did not respond.
Accordingly, upon consideration of the allegations in the petition for disciplinary or
remedial action, it is this 25th day of July 2025, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,
ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 19-737(d)(2), the Respondent, Duncan
Kenner Brent, is immediately suspended from the practice of law in the State of
Maryland;1 and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall send notice of this Order in accordance Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal with Maryland Rule 19-761. Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader 2025.07.25 Chief Justice '00'04- 08:47:53 Gregory Hilton, Clerk 1 The petition for disciplinary or remedial action remains pending. Bar Counsel filed its response to this Court’s June 13, 2025 order to show cause and the time for Mr. Brent to response has not run.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Brent, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-brent-md-2025.