Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Baum
This text of Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Baum (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Baum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 28 * MATTHEW ADAM BAUM September Term, 2024 *
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition for disciplinary or remedial action and
request for immediate suspension filed by Petitioner, it is this 21st day of February
2025, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,
ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 19-738(e), the Respondent, Matthew Adam
Baum, is immediately suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland,
pending further order of the Court; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Matthew Adam
Baum from the register of attorneys in this Court and shall send notice of this Order to
the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all
judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2025.02.21 13:21:33 -05'00' Gregory Hilton, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Baum, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-baum-md-2025.