Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Baum

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided February 21, 2025·No. 28ag/24·Published

Opinion

*

IN THE

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE

*

COMMISSION SUPREME COURT

*

OF MARYLAND

v.

*

AG No. 28

*

MATTHEW ADAM BAUM September Term, 2024

*

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition for disciplinary or remedial action and

request for immediate suspension filed by Petitioner, it is this 21st day of February

2025, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 19-738(e), the Respondent, Matthew Adam

Baum, is immediately suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland,

pending further order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Matthew Adam

Baum from the register of attorneys in this Court and shall send notice of this Order to

the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all

judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

Chief Justice

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2025.02.21 13:21:33 -05'00'

Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Baum, (Md. 2025).

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Baum (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Baum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.