Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Antonacci

• Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland
• Decided: May 27, 2026
• Docket: 2ag/26
• Status: Published

Opinion

* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * SUPREME COURT

* OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 2 LOUIS BERNARDO ANTONACCI * September Term, 2026

ORDER

In its petition for disciplinary or remdial action, the Attorney Grievance

Commission alleges that Respondent, Louis Bernardo Antonacci, was suspended

from the practice of law in the Commonwelath of Virginia for a year and two days

for violations of Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct 1.9 and 3.1. Based upon the

suspension in Virginia, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals imposed

corresponding discipline on the respondent. Pursuant to Rule 19-737(d), the

Commission requested that Respondent be immediately suspended from the practice

of law.

Upon consideration of the petition for disciplinary or remedial action and the

request for immediate suspension and upon consideration of Respondent’s response

to the Court’s order to show cause, it is this 27th day of May 2026, by the Supreme

Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 19-737(d), Respondent, Louis Bernardo

Antonacci, is immediately suspended from the practice of law in the State of

Maryland; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall send notice of this Order in

accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2026.05.27 '00'04- 10:32:23 Gregory Hilton, Clerk