Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Sud

178 A.3d 1240, 457 Md. 395
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided February 8, 2018·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 62, Sept. Term, 2017·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having considered the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed by Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, and Respondent, Anuj Sud, it is the 8th, day of February, 2018;

ORDERED, that Anuj Sud, be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland for violating Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct 8.4(b) and (d); and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Anuj Sud from the register of attorneys and, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-761, shall certify the fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Sud, 178 A.3d 1240, 457 Md. 395 (Md. 2018).

178 A.3d 1240 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Sud) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Linton v. Access Funding
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2022
Linton v. Consumer Protection Division
225 A.3d 456 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2020)