Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Stuart

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Stuart

163 A.3d 191, 454 Md. 77, 2017 WL 2830769, 2017 Md. LEXIS 459

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedJune 30, 2017

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 18, Sept. Term, 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 163 A.3d 191 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Stuart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Stuart, 163 A.3d 191, 454 Md. 77, 2017 WL 2830769, 2017 Md. LEXIS 459 (Md. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

**77This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action, with attached certified copy of an Order entered January 5, 2017, whereby the Supreme Court of Florida suspended Pamela Bruce Stuart from the practice of law in Florida for one year, effective thirty days from the date of the Order; and it appearing that said Pamela Bruce Stuart is admitted to the Bar of this Court;

NOW, THEREFORE, it is this 30th day of June, 2017,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-737(d), that Pamela Bruce Stuart, Respondent, is hereby suspended, effective immediately, from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, pending **78further order of this Court; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Pamela Bruce Stuart from the register of attorneys in this Court and comply with the notice provisions of Maryland Rule 19-761(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

**77This matter having come before the Court upon the filing of a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action, with attached certified copy of an Order entered January 5, 2017, whereby the Supreme Court of Florida suspended Pamela Bruce Stuart from the practice of law in Florida for one year, effective thirty days from the date of the Order; and it appearing that said Pamela Bruce Stuart is admitted to the Bar of this Court;

NOW, THEREFORE, it is this 30th day of June, 2017,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-737(d), that Pamela Bruce Stuart, Respondent, is hereby suspended, effective immediately, from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, pending **78further order of this Court; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Pamela Bruce Stuart from the register of attorneys in this Court and comply with the notice provisions of Maryland Rule 19-761(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 A.3d 191, 454 Md. 77, 2017 WL 2830769, 2017 Md. LEXIS 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-of-md-v-stuart-md-2017.