Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Siegel

176 A.3d 740, 457 Md. 134
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJanuary 3, 2018
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 56, Sept. Term, 2017
StatusPublished

This text of 176 A.3d 740 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Siegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Siegel, 176 A.3d 740, 457 Md. 134 (Md. 2018).

Opinion

Clayton Greene Jr., Senior Judge

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Stacy Enid LeBow Siegel, to disbar the Respondent from the practice of law for violations of Rules 1.15 (a) and (c) and 8.4(c) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct. The Court having considered the Petition, and the record herein, it is this 3rd day of January, 2018;

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Stacy Enid LeBow Siegel, be and she is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective sixty (60) days from the entry of this Order, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Stacy Enid LeBow Siegel from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all clerks *741of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-742.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 A.3d 740, 457 Md. 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-of-md-v-siegel-md-2018.