Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. McGill

175 A.3d 824, 457 Md. 112
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedDecember 20, 2017
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 51, Sept. Term, 2017
StatusPublished

This text of 175 A.3d 824 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. McGill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. McGill, 175 A.3d 824, 457 Md. 112 (Md. 2017).

Opinion

The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having considered the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission and Respondent, David Leslie McGill, to place Respondent on Inactive Status by Consent pursuant to Maryland Rules 19-736(c), it is this 20th of December, 2017;

ORDERED, that the Joint Petition be, and it is hereby GRANTED, and the Respondent, David Leslie McGill, is hereby placed on Inactive Status by consent; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of David Leslie McGill from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 A.3d 824, 457 Md. 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-of-md-v-mcgill-md-2017.