Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Litchfield

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Litchfield

147 A.3d 371, 450 Md. 176, 2016 Md. LEXIS 595

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedOctober 7, 2016

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 49; Sept. Term, 2016

StatusPublished

This text of 147 A.3d 371 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Litchfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Litchfield, 147 A.3d 371, 450 Md. 176, 2016 Md. LEXIS 595 (Md. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

**176Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736 and Respondent's acknowledgement therein that sufficient evidence exists to sustain allegations that she committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules 1.3, 1.4(a)(2)-(3), 1.15(a) & (d), 4.1, 8.1(b) and 8.4(a)(b)(c) & (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct in effect at the time of the misconduct, it is this 7th day of October, 2016,

ORDERED, that Amber Kaye Litchfield, Respondent, is hereby disbarred by consent from the practice of law in this State, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Amber Kaye Litchfield from the register of attorneys **177in this Court, notify Respondent of the filing of this order in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-742(a)(1), and comply with the notice provisions set forth in Maryland Rule 19-761(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

**176Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736 and Respondent's acknowledgement therein that sufficient evidence exists to sustain allegations that she committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules 1.3, 1.4(a)(2)-(3), 1.15(a) & (d), 4.1, 8.1(b) and 8.4(a)(b)(c) & (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct in effect at the time of the misconduct, it is this 7th day of October, 2016,

ORDERED, that Amber Kaye Litchfield, Respondent, is hereby disbarred by consent from the practice of law in this State, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Amber Kaye Litchfield from the register of attorneys **177in this Court, notify Respondent of the filing of this order in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-742(a)(1), and comply with the notice provisions set forth in Maryland Rule 19-761(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 A.3d 371, 450 Md. 176, 2016 Md. LEXIS 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-of-md-v-litchfield-md-2016.