Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Hulthage

185 A.3d 169, 459 Md. 354
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMay 21, 2018
Docket78ag/17
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 185 A.3d 169 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Hulthage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Hulthage, 185 A.3d 169, 459 Md. 354 (Md. 2018).

Opinion

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, in which the Respondent admits that sufficient evidence exists to sustain allegations that she committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1, 1.6, 1.16, 3.1 and 8.4(a) and (d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, it is this 21st day of May, 2018,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Suzanne Nicole Hulthage, be and she is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Suzanne Nicole Hulthage from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland all clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-742; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Respondent shall not petition for reinstatement unless and until she has been deemed fit to practice law by a medical provider acceptable to Bar Counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Com. v. Pichalsky, D.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 A.3d 169, 459 Md. 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-of-md-v-hulthage-md-2018.