Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Hulthage

185 A.3d 169, 459 Md. 354
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 21, 2018·No. 78ag/17·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, in which the Respondent admits that sufficient evidence exists to sustain allegations that she committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1, 1.6, 1.16, 3.1 and 8.4(a) and (d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, it is this 21st day of May, 2018,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Suzanne Nicole Hulthage, be and she is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Suzanne Nicole Hulthage from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland all clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-742; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Respondent shall not petition for reinstatement unless and until she has been deemed fit to practice law by a medical provider acceptable to Bar Counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Hulthage, 185 A.3d 169, 459 Md. 354 (Md. 2018).

185 A.3d 169 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Hulthage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Com. v. Pichalsky, D.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2020