Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Harris

160 A.3d 687, 453 Md. 250, 2017 WL 2298026, 2017 Md. LEXIS 339

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedMay 25, 2017

DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 112, Sept. Term, 2016

StatusPublished

This text of 160 A.3d 687 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Harris, 160 A.3d 687, 453 Md. 250, 2017 WL 2298026, 2017 Md. LEXIS 339 (Md. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, and Respondent's acknowledgment therein that sufficient evidence exists to sustain allegations that he committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1, 1.2(a), 1.3, 1.4(a)(2)-(3), 1.15(a) and (d), 8.4(a), (b), (c), and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct, in effect prior to July 1, 2016, current Maryland Rule 19-308.1(b), as well as Maryland Business Occupations and Professions Code Ann. § 10-304 and § 10-306, it is this 25th day of May, 2017,

ORDERED , that Respondent, Roger Lee Harris, Jr., be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED , that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Roger Lee Harris, Jr. from the register of attorneys in the Court, notify Respondent of such action, and comply with the notice provisions set forth in Maryland Rule 19-761(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, and Respondent's acknowledgment therein that sufficient evidence exists to sustain allegations that he committed professional misconduct in violation of Rules 1.1, 1.2(a), 1.3, 1.4(a)(2)-(3), 1.15(a) and (d), 8.4(a), (b), (c), and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct, in effect prior to July 1, 2016, current Maryland Rule 19-308.1(b), as well as Maryland Business Occupations and Professions Code Ann. § 10-304 and § 10-306, it is this 25th day of May, 2017,

ORDERED , that Respondent, Roger Lee Harris, Jr., be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED , that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Roger Lee Harris, Jr. from the register of attorneys in the Court, notify Respondent of such action, and comply with the notice provisions set forth in Maryland Rule 19-761(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 A.3d 687, 453 Md. 250, 2017 WL 2298026, 2017 Md. LEXIS 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-of-md-v-harris-md-2017.